1 Introduction

Human activities have profoundly transformed the Earth's environment and ecosystems. From the early days of hunter-gatherer societies to the modern era of global supply chains, humans have continuously reshaped the biosphere, lithosphere, atmosphere, and climate to sustain their needs (Ellis, 2019). This transformation is evident in the significant alteration of land surfaces, increased atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and the extensive use of natural resources. The rapid urbanization and industrialization have further intensified these impacts, making human influence a dominant force in shaping Earth's surface processes (Fahrenkamp-Uppenbrink, 2017; Gross, 2019). The complexity and heterogeneity of social institutions and infrastructures that manage Earth's limited resources highlight the intricate relationship between human societies and the environment (Ellis, 2019).

The term “Anthropocene” has been proposed to describe a new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on the Earth's geology and ecosystems. This concept underscores the extensive anthropogenic influence not only on the biotic environment but also on sedimentary and geomorphological processes (Tarolli, 2016). The recognition of the Anthropocene has profound implications, as it suggests that human activities have pushed the Earth system beyond its natural boundaries, leading to potential critical transitions in the biosphere (Fu and Li, 2016). The debate around formalizing the Anthropocene as a distinct geological epoch reflects the growing acknowledgment of humans as a major geological force (Tarolli, 2016; Bryant, 2018). This epoch is marked by unprecedented changes in atmospheric composition, land use, and biodiversity, driven by human consumption and technological advancements (Fu and Li, 2016; Otto et al., 2020).

By exploring the historical and contemporary impacts of human activities, this study will provide a comprehensive understanding of how society has changed the environment and the resulting ecological consequences, delving into the concept of the Anthropocene and analyzing its implications for future sustainability and environmental management. Through an interdisciplinary approach, this research will contribute to the ongoing discussion on human-environment interactions and the need for sustainable practices that mitigate adverse impacts on the planet. By integrating insights from various studies, this study aims to provide a holistic view of humanity's impact on the Earth's environment and ecosystems, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable management of natural resources to ensure a balanced coexistence between human society and the natural world.

2 Human Evolution and the Development of Societies

2.1 Overview of human evolution and the emergence of early societies

Human evolution has been a complex process marked by significant milestones that have shaped the development of societies. For most of human history, approximately 300 000 years, humans lived as hunter-gatherers in small, egalitarian communities. These early societies were sustainable and adapted to their environments, relying on a deep understanding of biophysical systems (Gowdy, 2020). The transition to more complex societies began with the advent of the Holocene epoch around 12 000 years ago, which brought climate stability and warmer temperatures, facilitating a greater dependence on wild grains and eventually leading to the development of agriculture.

2.2 The transition from hunter-gatherer societies to agricultural civilizations

The shift from hunter-gatherer societies to agricultural civilizations, often referred to as the Neolithic Revolution, was a pivotal moment in human history. This transition was driven by the increased productivity of agriculture, which allowed for population growth and the establishment of more permanent settlements. High agricultural productivity not only triggered the Neolithic Revolution but also set the stage for subsequent industrialization (Chu and Xu, 2023). The spread of agriculture was significantly influenced by migration and admixture, as evidenced by genomic studies showing that the farming way of life, which originated in the Near East, spread to Europe through long-range population movements. This agricultural expansion fundamentally altered the demographic and genetic landscape of Europe, leading to the displacement of hunter-gatherer populations by incoming farmers (Skoglund et al., 2012).

2.3 The role of technology and innovation in expanding human influence

Technological and cultural innovations have played a crucial role in expanding human influence and shaping societies. In hunter-gatherer societies, multilevel social structures facilitated cultural innovation through the recombination of cultural traditions, accelerating cumulative cultural evolution despite low population densities (Figure 1) (Migliano et al., 2020). This social organization allowed for the maintenance and transmission of cultural adaptations, which were critical for the global expansion of Homo sapiens (Migliano et al., 2020). Additionally, technological advancements in sleep environments among hunter-gatherers, such as the use of grass huts for thermal regulation, highlight the importance of environmental manipulation in improving living conditions and facilitating human migration to diverse habitats (Samson et al., 2017). These innovations underscore the adaptive nature of human societies and their ability to leverage technology to enhance survival and expand their influence across the planet.

3 Agriculture and Land Use Change

3.1 The origins of agriculture and its impact on natural landscapes

The origins of agriculture date back approximately 10 000 to 8 000 years ago, marking a significant shift in human interaction with the environment. Early agricultural practices led to the transformation of natural landscapes, as hunter-gatherers, farmers, and pastoralists began to modify the Earth's surface extensively. By 3 000 years ago, human land use had already left a global imprint, challenging the notion that large-scale anthropogenic environmental change is a recent phenomenon (Figure 1) (Stephens et al., 2019). The development of agriculture not only altered the land but also had implications for the global carbon cycle. For instance, deforestation for agricultural purposes started thousands of years ago, contributing to carbon release into the atmosphere long before the industrial revolution (Olofsson and Hickler, 2008).

3.2 Deforestation, soil degradation, and the expansion of agricultural frontiers

Deforestation and soil degradation have been persistent issues associated with the expansion of agricultural frontiers. Human activities such as excessive tillage, inappropriate crop rotations, and deforestation have led to significant soil erosion and degradation, threatening the sustainability of soil resources (Karlen and Rice, 2015). The Carpathian region, for example, experienced substantial agricultural land-use changes over the past 250 years, driven by socio-economic and institutional factors. These changes included periods of increased agricultural land use followed by sharp declines, highlighting the complex interplay between human activities and land cover (Munteanu et al., 2014). Additionally, the impact of agriculture on soil landscapes has been profound, with evidence showing that soil erosion and development were significantly influenced by human activities, particularly since the onset of agriculture in the region (Rothacker et al., 2018).

3.3 The Green Revolution and modern agricultural practices

The Green Revolution, which began in the mid-20th century, introduced high-yield crop varieties and advanced agricultural techniques, leading to dramatic increases in agricultural productivity. However, this revolution also brought trade-offs, such as land and soil degradation, greenhouse gas emissions, and the spread of toxic substances (Olsson et al., 2023). Modern agricultural practices continue to shape the Earth's landscapes, with significant implications for soil health and carbon storage. For instance, the historical Green Revolution in Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East was found to be land and emissions sparing compared to a counterfactual scenario without these innovations. However, a prospective Green Revolution in Africa could potentially lead to global cropland expansion and increased CO₂ emissions due to the integrated global agricultural economy (Hertel et al., 2014). The challenge remains to balance productivity with sustainable land management practices to mitigate soil degradation and ensure long-term food security (Amundson et al., 2015).

4 Urbanization and Infrastructure Development

4.1 The rise of cities and urbanization trends throughout history

Urbanization has been a defining feature of human development, with cities emerging as central hubs of economic, social, and cultural activities. Historically, the shift from agrarian societies to urban centers began with the advent of agriculture, but the pace of urbanization has accelerated dramatically in recent centuries. The human population has increasingly concentrated in urban areas, with more than half of the global population now residing in cities (Johnson and Munshi-South, 2017; Gross, 2019). This trend is expected to continue, with projections indicating that the global urban population will reach 9.7 billion by 2050. The rapid expansion of cities has been driven by intrinsic population growth and migration, particularly in developing nations located in biodiversity-rich tropical and subtropical regions (Laurance and Engert, 2022).

4.2 Impact of urban sprawl on ecosystems and biodiversity

Urban sprawl, characterized by the uncontrolled expansion of urban areas into surrounding natural habitats, poses significant threats to ecosystems and biodiversity. As cities grow, they often engulf and transform adjacent lands, leading to habitat loss and fragmentation. This encroachment has dire consequences for local wildlife, as evidenced by the decline in species such as the Manaus harlequin frog and the pied tamarin in the Amazon (Laurance and Engert, 2022). Urbanization not only reduces the abundance and diversity of native species but also alters the genetic makeup of populations, leading to rapid evolutionary changes that can impact ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling and pollination (Figure 2) (Johnson and Munshi-South, 2017; Alberti, 2023). Furthermore, urban sprawl disrupts ecological networks, reshaping food webs and increasing the vulnerability of rare species (Start et al., 2020).

4.3 Infrastructure development and its environmental consequences

The development of urban infrastructure, including buildings, roads, and other facilities, significantly impacts the environment. Traditional infrastructure often replaces natural habitats, leading to a decline in local biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, there is growing momentum for implementing green infrastructure (GI) solutions, such as green roofs and community gardens, which can mitigate some of these negative effects. GI has been shown to improve biodiversity and provide ecosystem services comparable to natural habitats (Filazzola et al., 2019). Despite these benefits, the design and implementation of GI often lack rigorous experimental frameworks, highlighting the need for more robust research and better integration of ecological principles into urban planning.

Urbanization also reshapes ecological interactions, creating novel ecosystems with unique challenges and opportunities. For instance, cities tend to support less diverse ecological communities, but the remaining species often form more integrated interaction networks, which can influence ecological stability and conservation planning (Start et al., 2020). Additionally, urban infrastructure can act as barriers to gene flow, further contributing to genetic differentiation among populations (Johnson and Munshi-South, 2017). Addressing these complex dynamics requires a comprehensive understanding of urban ecology and the incorporation of sustainability principles into urban development strategies (Wu, 2014).

In summary, the rise of cities and the associated urban sprawl have profound impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity. While infrastructure development poses significant environmental challenges, innovative approaches such as green infrastructure offer potential solutions for creating more sustainable urban environments. Understanding and mitigating the ecological consequences of urbanization is crucial for maintaining biodiversity and ensuring the long-term health of our planet.

5 Industrialization and the Anthropocene

5.1 The Industrial Revolution and its global environmental impact

The Industrial Revolution, which began in the late 18th century, marked a significant turning point in human history, fundamentally altering the relationship between humans and the environment. This period saw the advent of mechanized production, leading to an unprecedented increase in the consumption of natural resources and the emission of pollutants. The widespread use of fossil fuels, such as coal and later oil, powered factories, transportation, and homes, leading to a dramatic rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. This increase in greenhouse gases has been a major driver of climate change, contributing to global warming and altering weather patterns (Steffen et al., 2007; Finlayson-Pitts, 2017).

The environmental impact of the Industrial Revolution extended beyond climate change. The period also saw significant deforestation, soil degradation, and water pollution as industries expanded and urban areas grew. The introduction of new agricultural practices and the expansion of farmland further exacerbated these issues, leading to a loss of biodiversity and the disruption of ecosystems (Steffen et al., 2011; Roberts et al., 2018). The Industrial Revolution set the stage for the Anthropocene, a new geological epoch characterized by the dominant influence of human activities on the Earth's systems (Jasanoff, 2021; Little et al., 2023).

5.2 Fossil fuels, energy consumption, and climate change

The reliance on fossil fuels has been a defining feature of the Anthropocene. The combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas has been the primary source of energy for industrial activities, transportation, and electricity generation. This has led to a significant increase in the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, particularly carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄). Since the pre-industrial era, atmospheric CO₂ levels have risen from approximately 270~275 ppm to over 400 ppm today, with a substantial portion of this increase occurring in the last few decades (Steffen et al., 2007).

The consequences of this rise in greenhouse gases are profound. Climate change, driven by global warming, has led to more frequent and severe weather events, rising sea levels, and shifts in ecosystems and biodiversity. The impacts are felt globally, affecting food security, water resources, and human health. The interconnected nature of these challenges underscores the complexity of addressing climate change in the Anthropocene (Cavicchioli et al., 2019; Folke et al., 2021). Efforts to mitigate these impacts include transitioning to renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and developing technologies to capture and store carbon emissions (Otto et al., 2020; Little et al., 2023).

5.3 The shift towards a global economy and its ecological footprint

The Industrial Revolution also catalyzed the development of a global economy, characterized by the interconnectedness of markets, trade, and production systems. This shift has had significant ecological implications, as the demand for resources and the production of goods have expanded to meet the needs of a growing global population. The ecological footprint of human activities has increased, leading to the overexploitation of natural resources, habitat destruction, and pollution (Steffen et al., 2011; Ellis, 2023).

Globalization has facilitated the spread of industrial practices and technologies, further amplifying human impact on the environment. The "Great Acceleration" of the mid-20th century, marked by rapid economic growth and technological advancement, has intensified these trends. The resulting environmental degradation poses significant challenges for sustainability and resilience (Steffen et al., 2007; Folke et al., 2021). Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach that includes sustainable resource management, the promotion of circular economies, and the adoption of policies that balance economic development with environmental protection (Jasanoff, 2021; Little et al., 2023).

The Industrial Revolution and the subsequent rise of a global economy have profoundly shaped the Anthropocene. The reliance on fossil fuels and the expansion of industrial activities have driven significant environmental changes, highlighting the need for transformative approaches to achieve a sustainable and resilient future.

6 Case Study: The Amazon Rainforest and Human Impact

6.1 Historical context of human activity in the Amazon

The Amazon rainforest has been a critical component of the Earth's ecosystem for millennia, sustaining human existence for over 10 000 years (Peng et al., 2019). Historically, the region has been shaped by various phases of land use, driven by colonial and modern economic agendas. These phases include resource extraction, agricultural development, and infrastructure expansion, often at the expense of Indigenous peoples and their lands (Urzedo and Chatterjee, 2021). The recent policies under the Bolsonaro administration have further accelerated deforestation, echoing the land development goals of past military regimes (Urzedo and Chatterjee, 2021).

6.2 Deforestation, agriculture, and mining in the region

Deforestation in the Amazon is driven by multiple factors, including agriculture, mining, and climate change. Agriculture, particularly for export markets, has led to significant forest loss, with Brazil contributing to 79% of the deforestation in 2020 (Perry, 2022). Mining activities, especially illegal ones, have also surged, posing a growing threat to Indigenous Lands (ILs) (Mataveli et al., 2022). The degradation of the Amazon is not limited to deforestation; it also includes forest degradation from timber extraction, fires, and habitat fragmentation, which collectively contribute to substantial carbon emissions and biodiversity loss (Figure 3) (Matricardi et al., 2020; Albert et al., 2023; Lapola et al., 2023).

6.3 Conservation efforts and the challenges of balancing development and preservation

Efforts to conserve the Amazon rainforest have seen some success, particularly in the reduction of deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon by 80% over the last decade (Nobre et al., 2016). However, these efforts face significant challenges. The need to balance environmental conservation with economic development remains a paradox, as agriculture and mining continue to drive deforestation (Mataveli et al., 2022; Perry, 2022). Innovative approaches, such as viewing the Amazon as a global public good and leveraging high-tech innovations for sustainable development, are proposed as potential solutions (Nobre et al., 2016). Nonetheless, the effectiveness of conservation policies varies across the region, with protected areas and public policies showing more success compared to supply chain approaches (Hänggli et al., 2023). The ongoing degradation and deforestation underscore the urgent need for comprehensive and integrated policies to address the multifaceted threats to the Amazon (Albert et al., 2023; Lapola et al., 2023).

7 Human Influence on Global Biogeochemical Cycles

7.1 Alteration of the carbon cycle and its implications for climate

Human activities have significantly altered the global carbon cycle, primarily through the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation. These activities have increased atmospheric CO₂ levels, which in turn have enhanced the greenhouse effect, leading to global warming. The partitioning of anthropogenic CO₂ among its various sinks—such as the atmosphere, terrestrial ecosystems, and oceans- has been extensively studied. For instance, the Terrestrial-Ocean-aTmosphere Ecosystem Model (TOTEM) has shown that over the past 300 years, a significant portion of anthropogenic CO₂ has been stored in the atmosphere and the open ocean, while human activities on land have led to increased carbon loss from terrestrial organic matter reservoirs (Ver et al., 1999). Additionally, the enhanced photosynthetic uptake by terrestrial phytomass due to increased atmospheric CO₂ concentrations has been supported by nutrients remineralized from organic matter. However, the overall impact of human activities has been a net increase in atmospheric CO₂, contributing to climate change.

7.2 Human impact on the nitrogen and phosphorus cycles

Human activities have also profoundly impacted the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles. The use of fertilizers in agriculture has massively increased the input of these nutrients into ecosystems, leading to imbalances and environmental consequences. For example, human-induced nitrogen and phosphorus inputs have altered biogeochemical cycles and trophic states of many habitats worldwide, causing declines in invertebrate populations and affecting ecosystem-level processes (Nessel et al., 2021). The global mobilization of phosphorus has tripled due to human activities, leading to increased P accumulation in soils and enhanced eutrophication in aquatic systems, which impairs water quality and reduces biodiversity (Yuan et al., 2018). Similarly, human alterations of the nitrogen cycle have approximately doubled the rate of nitrogen input into terrestrial ecosystems, increased concentrations of greenhouse gases like N₂O, and contributed to soil acidification and nutrient losses. These changes have significant implications for ecosystem functioning and biodiversity.

7.3 Consequences for marine and terrestrial ecosystems

The alterations in the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles have far-reaching consequences for both marine and terrestrial ecosystems. In marine environments, increased nutrient inputs from terrestrial sources have led to eutrophication, which can cause harmful algal blooms and dead zones, severely impacting marine biodiversity and fisheries (Yuan et al., 2018). In terrestrial ecosystems, the imbalance in nutrient availability can limit primary production and alter species composition and ecosystem dynamics. For instance, the limited availability of phosphorus relative to nitrogen and carbon is likely to reduce future carbon storage by natural ecosystems, affecting their ability to mitigate climate change (Peñuelas et al., 2013). Additionally, nutrient enrichment has been shown to decrease invertebrate abundance in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, further disrupting ecological balance (Nessel et al., 2021). The combined effects of these changes highlight the need for sustainable management of nutrient inputs to protect ecosystem health and biodiversity.

In summary, human activities have significantly altered the global biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, leading to profound and often detrimental impacts on both marine and terrestrial ecosystems. These changes underscore the importance of integrated and sustainable approaches to managing nutrient inputs and mitigating their environmental consequences.

8 Biodiversity Loss and Species Extinction

8.1 The role of human activities in driving species extinctions

Human activities have significantly accelerated the rate of species extinctions, far exceeding natural background rates. Overexploitation, habitat destruction, and the introduction of invasive species are primary drivers of this crisis. Extinction rates are now estimated to be 1000 to 10,000 times higher than the expected natural rate, with 24% of mammals and 12% of birds currently at risk of extinction. The synergistic effects of these activities often exacerbate the risk of extinction, making conservation efforts that target single threats insufficient (Brook et al., 2008). For instance, overexploitation frequently operates in conjunction with habitat loss, amplifying the decline of species populations.

8.2 Habitat destruction, overexploitation, and the introduction of invasive species

Habitat destruction is a major driver of biodiversity loss, with significant portions of natural habitats being converted for agricultural and urban development (Kumari et al., 2021). This destruction not only reduces the available habitat for species but also fragments populations, making them more vulnerable to extinction. Overexploitation, such as hunting and logging, further depletes species populations, often beyond their capacity to recover. Invasive species, particularly invasive mammalian predators like cats, rodents, dogs, and pigs, have been implicated in the extinction or endangerment of numerous vertebrate species, contributing to 58% of all bird, mammal, and reptile extinctions (Doherty et al., 2016). These invasive species are particularly damaging to insular environments, where endemic species are most vulnerable (Doherty et al., 2016).

8.3 Conservation strategies and the role of protected areas

Conservation strategies are crucial in mitigating biodiversity loss. Protected areas play a significant role in preserving species by providing refuges from overexploitation and habitat destruction. For example, protected areas have been shown to maintain higher densities of overexploited plant species, such as the palm Euterpe edulis, compared to non-protected areas (Souza and Prevedello, 2020). However, only a small fraction of high-value biodiversity habitats are currently protected, highlighting the need for increased conservation commitments (Mokany et al., 2019). Additionally, wilderness areas, which experience minimal human disturbance, act as buffers against species loss and are essential for the long-term persistence of biodiversity (Marco et al., 2019). Effective conservation strategies must integrate the protection of both intact wilderness areas and highly modified regions to halt ongoing extinctions (Mokany et al., 2019). Despite the challenges, conservation efforts have had some success in slowing the rate of biodiversity decline, though they remain insufficient to counteract the primary drivers of biodiversity loss.

9 The Future of Human Influence on the Planet

9.1 The potential for sustainable development and environmental stewardship

Sustainable development and environmental stewardship are critical for ensuring the long-term health of our planet. The integration of bottom-up approaches in global environmental assessments (GEAs) has shown promise in addressing sustainability challenges. By incorporating local practices and perspectives, decision-makers can develop more equitable and actionable solutions (Pereira et al., 2021). Additionally, initiatives such as the "seeds of a good Anthropocene" emphasize the importance of drawing from diverse practices and values to foster transformative change. These initiatives highlight the potential for positive pathways that can fundamentally alter human-environmental relationships (Bennett et al., 2016; Raudsepp-Hearne et al., 2019).

9.2 The role of technology and innovation in mitigating human impact

Technology and innovation play pivotal roles in mitigating human impact on the environment. Information technology (IT) has the potential to act as an agency of environmental sustainability, as discussed by Tomlinson. His perspective of “cautious optimism” suggests that IT can contribute positively to climate change mitigation through advancements such as smart power grids, mobile IT technologies for small-scale agriculture, and product life-cycle assessments. Furthermore, the development of low-cost, sustainable, and pollution-free energy technologies could significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainable lifestyles (Blevis, 2011).

9.3 Scenarios for the future: optimistic and pessimistic outlooks

Future scenarios provide valuable insights into the potential trajectories of human influence on the planet. Tomlinson presents two illustrative scenarios: a "doomsday scenario" characterized by overpopulation and environmental degradation, and a "best-case scenario" driven by technological advancements and widespread behavioral change (Blevis, 2011). Similarly, other studies have explored both pessimistic and optimistic visions of the future. For instance, one scenario describes social regression and global destruction due to socio-political and economic factors, while another envisions a sustainable world free from current constraints. These scenarios underscore the importance of proactive measures and innovative solutions to steer humanity towards a more sustainable future.

In conclusion, the future of human influence on the planet hinges on our ability to embrace sustainable development, leverage technology and innovation, and navigate the complex interplay of socio-political and environmental factors. By adopting a holistic and inclusive approach, people can work towards a future that ensures the well-being of both humanity and the natural world.

10 Concluding Remarks

Human activities have profoundly transformed the Earth's ecosystems and landscapes over millennia. From early hunter-gatherer societies to modern urban centers, humans have continuously reshaped the environment to meet their needs. This transformation includes the alteration of nearly three-quarters of terrestrial nature through practices such as burning, hunting, and agriculture, which have left lasting legacies on the biosphere. The industrial era has further accelerated these changes, with significant impacts on land use, atmospheric composition, and biodiversity. The concept of Earth Stewardship emphasizes the need for integrating human activities with natural systems to enhance ecosystem resilience and human well-being. Cities, as major hubs of human activity, play a crucial role in this dynamic, necessitating sustainable practices that consider both urban and rural resource dependencies.

The extensive human influence on the planet carries significant implications for future generations. The current biodiversity crisis, driven by the appropriation and intensification of land use, underscores the need for responsible environmental stewardship. Empowering Indigenous peoples and local communities, who have historically managed landscapes sustainably, is critical for conserving biodiversity. The concept of planetary stewardship calls for coordinated governance and interconnected solutions to address global environmental and social challenges. Education plays a pivotal role in fostering this stewardship, promoting an understanding of the Earth as an interconnected system and encouraging geoethically responsible management. By learning from past successes and failures, societies can develop sustainable practices that enhance resilience and ensure the well-being of future generations.

To balance human needs with environmental preservation, several strategies are recommended. Encourage practices that align with the ecological properties of resources and the needs of their users, leveraging local knowledge and traditional management systems. Develop policies that foster cooperation between urban and rural areas, ensuring sustainable resource use and reducing the environmental footprint of cities. Develop coupled models that incorporate feedbacks between human and natural systems to better understand and manage their interactions. Implement educational programs that emphasize the interconnectedness of Earth's systems and the importance of sustainable management, fostering a sense of responsibility among citizens. Recognize and empower the environmental stewardship of Indigenous peoples and local communities, who have a deep cultural connection with biodiversity and sustainable land management practices. Prioritize the conservation of remaining intact ecosystems, particularly those with low human influence, to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services. By adopting these recommendations, societies can work towards a sustainable future that balances human development with the preservation of the Earth's ecological heritage.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to anonymous peer reviewers for critically reading the manuscript and providing valuable feedback that improved the clarity of the text..

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Albert J., Carnaval A., Flantua S., Lohmann L., Ribas C., Riff D., Carrillo J., Fan Y., Figueiredo J., Guayasamin J., Hoorn C., Melo G., Nascimento N., Quesada C., Ulloa C., Val P., Arieira J., Encalada A., and Nobre C., 2023, Human impacts outpace natural processes in the Amazon, Science, 379: 6630.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo5003

Alberti M., 2023, Cities of the Anthropocene: Urban sustainability in an eco-evolutionary perspective, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379(1893): 20220264.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0264

Amundson R., Berhe A., Hopmans J., Olson C., Sztein A., and Sparks D., 2015, Soil and human security in the 21st century, Science, 348: 6235.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261071

Bennett E., Solan M., Biggs R., McPhearson T., Norström A., Olsson P., Pereira L., Peterson G., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Biermann F., Carpenter S., Ellis E., Tn H., Galaz V., Lahsen M., Milkoreit M., López B., Nicholas K., Preiser R., Vince G., Vervoort J., and Xu J., 2016, Bright spots: Seeds of a good Anthropocene, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14: 441-448.

https://doi.org/10.1002/FEE.1309

Blevis E., 2011, Greening through IT: Information technology for environmental sustainability, Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(2): A96.

https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP.119-A96

Brook B., Sodhi N., and Bradshaw C., 2008, Synergies among extinction drivers under global change, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(8): 453-460.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.011

Bryant D., 2018, The human impact, American Biology Teacher, 80: 394-395.

https://doi.org/10.1525/ABT.2018.80.5.394

Cavicchioli R., Ripple W., Timmis K., Azam F., Bakken L., Baylis M., Behrenfeld M., Boetius A., Boyd P., Classen A., Crowther T., Danovaro R., Foreman C., Huisman J., Hutchins D., Jansson J., Karl D., Koskella B., Welch D., Martiny J., Moran M., Orphan V., Reay D., Remais J., Rich V., Singh B., Stein L., Stewart F., Sullivan M., Oppen M., Weaver S., Webb E., and Webster N., 2019, Scientists’ warning to humanity: Microorganisms and climate change, Nature Reviews Microbiology, 17: 569-586.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5

Chu A., and Xu R., 2023, From Neolithic revolution to industrialization, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 28(3): 699-717.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100523000214

Doherty T., Glen A., Nimmo D., Ritchie E., and Dickman C., 2016, Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113: 11261-11265.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602480113

Ellis E., 2019, Sharing the land between nature and people, Science, 364: 1226–1228.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2608

Ellis E., 2023, The Anthropocene condition: Evolving through social-ecological transformations, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379: 20220255.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0255

Fahrenkamp-Uppenbrink J., 2017, Humans—an overwhelming force?, Science, 356(6335): 280-283.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.356.6335.280-o

Filazzola A., Shrestha N., and Macivor J., 2019, The contribution of constructed green infrastructure to urban biodiversity: A synthesis and meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Ecology, 56(9): 2131-2143.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13475

Finlayson-Pitts B., 2017, Introductory lecture: Atmospheric chemistry in the Anthropocene, Faraday Discussions, 200: 11-58.

https://doi.org/10.1039/c7fd00161d

Folke C., Polasky S., Rockström J., Galaz V., Westley F., Lamont M., Scheffer M., Österblom H., Carpenter S., Chapin F., Seto K., Weber E., Crona B., Daily G., Dasgupta P., Gaffney O., Gordon L., Hoff H., Levin S., Lubchenco J., Steffen W., and Walker B., 2021, Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere, Ambio, 50: 834-869.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8

Fu B., and Li Y., 2016, Bidirectional coupling between the Earth and human systems is essential for modeling sustainability, National Science Review, 3: 397-398.

https://doi.org/10.1093/NSR/NWW094

Gowdy J., 2020, Our hunter-gatherer future: climate change, agriculture and uncivilization, Futures, 115: 102488.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102488

Gross M., 2019, The future is urbanised, Current Biology, 29: R947-R949.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.043

Hänggli A., Levy S., Pascual D., Bovolo I., Brandão J., Rueda X., and Garrett R., 2023, A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome, Environmental Research Letters, 18: 7.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd408

Hertel T., Ramankutty N., and Baldos U., 2014, Global market integration increases likelihood that a future African Green Revolution could increase cropland use and CO₂ emissions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111: 13799-13804.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403543111

Jasanoff S., 2021, Humility in the Anthropocene, Globalizations, 18: 839-853.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1859743

Johnson M., and Munshi-South J., 2017, Evolution of life in urban environments, Science, 358: 6363.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8327

Karlen D., and Rice C., 2015, Soil degradation: will humankind ever learn?, Sustainability, 7: 12490-12501.

https://doi.org/10.3390/SU70912490

Kumari R., Deepali, and Bhatnagar S., 2021, Biodiversity loss: threats and conservation strategies, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 68(1): 242-254.

https://doi.org/10.47583/ijpsrr.2021.v68i01.037

Lapola D., Pinho P., Barlow J., Aragão L., Berenguer E., Carmenta R., Liddy H., Seixas H., Silva C., Silva‐Junior C., Alencar A., Anderson L., Armenteras D., Brovkin V., Calders K., Chambers J., Chini L., Costa M., Faria B., Fearnside P., Ferreira J., Gatti L., Gutierrez-Velez V., Han Z., Hibbard K., Koven C., Lawrence P., Pongratz J., Portela B., Rounsevell M., Ruane A., Schaldach R., Silva S., Randow C., and Walker W., 2023, The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation, Science, 379: 6630.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp8622

Laurance W., and Engert J., 2022, Sprawling cities are rapidly encroaching on Earth’s biodiversity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(16): 2202244119.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202244119

Little J., Kaaronen R., Hukkinen J., Xiao S., Sharpee T., Farid A., Nilchiani R., and Barton C., 2023, Earth systems to Anthropocene systems: an evolutionary, system-of-systems, convergence paradigm for interdependent societal challenges, Environmental Science & Technology, 57(14): 5504-5520.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06203

Marco M., Ferrier S., Harwood T., Hoskins A., and Watson J., 2019, Wilderness areas halve the extinction risk of terrestrial biodiversity, Nature, 573: 582-585.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1567-7

Mataveli G., Chaves M., Guerrero J., Escobar-Silva E., Conceição K., and Oliveira G., 2022, Mining is a growing threat within indigenous lands of the Brazilian Amazon, Remote Sensing, 14(16): 4092.

https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14164092

Matricardi E., Skole D., Costa O., Pedlowski M., Samek J., and Miguel E., 2020, Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, Science, 369: 1378-1382.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3021

Migliano A., Battiston F., Viguier S., Page A., Dyble M., Schlaepfer R., Smith D., Astete L., Ngales M., Gómez-Gardeñes J., Latora V., and Vinicius L., 2020, Hunter-gatherer multilevel sociality accelerates cumulative cultural evolution, Science Advances, 6: 9.

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax5913

Mokany K., Ferrier S., Harwood T., Ware C., Marco M., Grantham H., Venter O., Hoskins A., and Watson J., 2019, Reconciling global priorities for conserving biodiversity habitat, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117: 9906-9911.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918373117

Munteanu C., Kuemmerle T., Boltižiar M., Butsic V., Gimmi U., Halada L., Kaim D., Király G., Konkoly-Gyuró É., Kozak J., Lieskovský J., Mojses M., Müller D., Ostafin K., Ostapowicz K., Shandra O., Štych P., Walker S., and Radeloff V., 2014, Forest and agricultural land change in the Carpathian region: a meta-analysis of long-term patterns and drivers of change, Land Use Policy, 38: 685-697.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2014.01.012

Nessel M., Konnovitch T., Romero G., and González A., 2021, Nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment cause declines in invertebrate populations: a global meta-analysis, Biological Reviews, 96(6): 2617-2637.

https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12771

Nobre C., Sampaio G., Borma L., Castilla-Rubio J., Silva J., and Cardoso M., 2016, Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113: 10759-10768.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605516113

Olofsson J., and Hickler T., 2008, Effects of human land-use on the global carbon cycle during the last 6000 years, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 17: 605-615.

https://doi.org/10.1007/S00334-007-0126-6

Olsson L., Cotrufo F., Crews T., Franklin J., King A., Mirzabaev A., Scown M., Tengberg A., Villarino S., and Wang Y., 2023, The state of the world's arable land, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48: 451-475.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-113741

Otto I., Wiedermann M., Cremades R., Donges J., Auer C., and Lucht W., 2020, Human agency in the Anthropocene, Ecological Economics, 167: 106463.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106463

Peng W., Sonne C., Lam S., Ok Y., and Alstrup A., 2019, The ongoing cut-down of the Amazon rainforest threatens the climate and requires global tree planting projects: a short review, Environmental Research, 181: 108887.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108887

Peñuelas J., Poulter B., Sardans J., Ciais P., Velde M., Bopp L., Boucher O., Goddéris Y., Hinsinger P., Llusià J., Nardin E., Vicca S., Obersteiner M., and Janssens I., 2013, Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe, Nature Communications, 4: 2934.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3934

Pereira L., Asrar G., Bhargava R., Fisher L., Hsu A., Jabbour J., Nel J., Selomane O., Sitas N., Trisos C., Ward J., Ende M., Vervoort J., and Weinfurter A., 2021, Grounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectives, Sustainability Science, 16: 1907-1922.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01013-x

Perry J., 2022, Using GIS to explore the consequences of agricultural practices in the Amazon rainforest, The Geography Teacher, 19: 80-84.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19338341.2022.205560

Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G., Bennett E., Biggs R., Norström A., Pereira L., Vervoort J., Iwaniec D., McPhearson T., Olsson P., Hichert T., Falardeau M., and Aceituno A., 2019, Seeds of good anthropocenes: developing sustainability scenarios for Northern Europe, Sustainability Science, 15: 605-617.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00714-8

Roberts P., Boivin N., and Kaplan J., 2018, Finding the Anthropocene in tropical forests, Anthropocene, 23: 5-16.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANCENE.2018.07.002

Rothacker L., Dosseto A., Francke A., Chivas A., Vigier N., Kotarba-Morley A., and Menozzi D., 2018, Impact of climate change and human activity on soil landscapes over the past 12 300 years, Scientific Reports, 8: 247.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18603-4

Samson D., Crittenden A., Mabulla I., and Mabulla A., 2017, The evolution of human sleep: technological and cultural innovation associated with sleep-wake regulation among Hadza hunter-gatherers, Journal of Human Evolution, 113: 91-102.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.08.005

Skoglund P., Malmström H., Raghavan M., Storå J., Hall P., Willerslev E., Gilbert M., Götherström A., and Jakobsson M., 2012, Origins and genetic legacy of neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe, Science, 336: 6080.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216304

Souza A., and Prevedello J., 2020, The importance of protected areas for overexploited plants: evidence from a biodiversity hotspot, Biological Conservation, 243: 108482.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108482

Start D., Barbour M., and Bonner C., 2020, Urbanization re-shapes a food web, The Journal of Animal Ecology, 89(3): 808-816.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13136

Steffen W., Crutzen P., and McNeill J., 2007, The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature, AMBIO, 36(8): 614–621.

https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2

Steffen W., Persson Å., Deutsch L., Zalasiewicz J., Williams M., Richardson K., Crumley C., Crutzen P., Folke C., Gordon L., Molina M., Ramanathan V., Rockström J., Scheffer M., Schellnhuber H., and Svedin U., 2011, The Anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship, AMBIO, 40: 739-761.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x

Stephens L., Fuller D., Boivin N., Rick T., Gauthier N., Kay A., Marwick B., Armstrong C., Barton C., Denham T., Douglass K., Driver J., Janz L., Roberts P., Rogers J., Thakar H., Altaweel M., Johnson A., Vattuone M., Aldenderfer M., Archila S., Artioli G., Bale M., Beach T., Borrell F., Braje T., Buckland P., Cano N., Capriles J., Castillo A., Çilingiroğlu Ç., Cleary M., Conolly J., Coutros P., Covey R., Cremaschi M., Crowther A., Der L., Lernia S., Doershuk J., Doolittle W., Edwards K., Erlandson J., Evans D., Fairbairn A., Faulkner P., Feinman G., Fernandes R., Fitzpatrick S., Fyfe R., Garcea E., Goldstein S., Goodman R., Guedes J., Herrmann J., Hiscock P., Hommel P., Horsburgh K., Hritz C., Ives J., Junno A., Kahn J., Kaufman B., Kearns C., Kidder T., Lanoë F., Lawrence D., Lee G., Levin M., Lindskoug H., López‐Sáez J., Macrae S., Marchant R., Marston J., McClure S., McCoy M., Miller A., Morrison M., Matuzevičiūtė G., Müller J., Nayak A., Noerwidi S., Peres T., Peterson C., Proctor L., Randall A., Renette S., Schug G., Ryzewski K., Saini R., Scheinsohn V., Schmidt P., Sebillaud P., Seitsonen O., Simpson I., Sołtysiak A., Speakman R., Spengler R., Steffen M., Storozum M., Strickland K., Thompson J., Thurston T., Ulm S., Ustunkaya M., Welker M., West C., Williams P., Wright D., Wright N., Zahir M., Zerboni A., Beaudoin E., Garcia S., Powell J., Thornton A., Kaplan J., Gaillard M., Goldewijk K., and Ellis E., 2019, Archaeological assessment reveals Earth’s early transformation through land use, Science, 365: 897-902.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1192

Tarolli P., 2016, Humans and the Earth's surface, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41: 2301-2304.

https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4059

Urzedo D., and Chatterjee P., 2021, The colonial reproduction of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: violence against Indigenous peoples for land development, Journal of Genocide Research, 23: 302-324.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2021.1905758

Ver L., Mackenzie F., and Lerman A., 1999, Biogeochemical responses of the carbon cycle to natural and human perturbations: past, present, and future, American Journal of Science, 299: 762-801.

https://doi.org/10.2475/AJS.299.7-9.762

Wu J., 2014, Urban ecology and sustainability: the state-of-the-science and future directions, Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 209-221.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2014.01.018

Yuan Z., Jiang S., Sheng H., Liu X., Hua H., Liu X., and Zhang Y., 2018, Human perturbation of the global phosphorus cycle: changes and consequences, Environmental Science & Technology, 52(5): 2438-2450.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03910